<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: 11% of all Twitters are sent using an Adobe AIR application</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.webkitchen.be/2009/01/05/11-of-all-twitters-are-sent-using-an-adobe-air-application/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.webkitchen.be/2009/01/05/11-of-all-twitters-are-sent-using-an-adobe-air-application/</link>
	<description>Life as an Adobe platform evangelist</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 Feb 2012 14:36:52 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Users don&#8217;t want rich &#124; @neilmiddleton</title>
		<link>http://www.webkitchen.be/2009/01/05/11-of-all-twitters-are-sent-using-an-adobe-air-application/comment-page-1/#comment-4144</link>
		<dc:creator>Users don&#8217;t want rich &#124; @neilmiddleton</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Sep 2009 22:29:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.webkitchen.be/?p=680#comment-4144</guid>
		<description>[...] Let&#8217;s take a look at richness in applications (the aforementioned whiz-bang element). Recently, there has been a huge movement by Adobe and Microsoft to get developers into using rich platform technologies such as Flash and Silverlight.  Whilst this is all very well, have a quick think about how many applications you use on a day-to-day basis you would consider to be rich (and buzzword bingo favourite &#8220;an immersive experience&#8221;).  Personally, there&#8217;s only one (Balsamiq Mockups if you want to know).  For most, it&#8217;s a twitter client. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Let&#8217;s take a look at richness in applications (the aforementioned whiz-bang element). Recently, there has been a huge movement by Adobe and Microsoft to get developers into using rich platform technologies such as Flash and Silverlight.  Whilst this is all very well, have a quick think about how many applications you use on a day-to-day basis you would consider to be rich (and buzzword bingo favourite &#8220;an immersive experience&#8221;).  Personally, there&#8217;s only one (Balsamiq Mockups if you want to know).  For most, it&#8217;s a twitter client. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Serge Jespers</title>
		<link>http://www.webkitchen.be/2009/01/05/11-of-all-twitters-are-sent-using-an-adobe-air-application/comment-page-1/#comment-2195</link>
		<dc:creator>Serge Jespers</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Feb 2009 19:10:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.webkitchen.be/?p=680#comment-2195</guid>
		<description>Yes. That is correct. It&#039;s probably higher now.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes. That is correct. It&#8217;s probably higher now.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jeetu</title>
		<link>http://www.webkitchen.be/2009/01/05/11-of-all-twitters-are-sent-using-an-adobe-air-application/comment-page-1/#comment-2194</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeetu</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Feb 2009 19:05:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.webkitchen.be/?p=680#comment-2194</guid>
		<description>&gt; Out of all Twitters, 

Did you mean out of all tweets on twitter ?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&gt; Out of all Twitters, </p>
<p>Did you mean out of all tweets on twitter ?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Buzz Meter: DestroyTwitter &#187; The Buzz Bin</title>
		<link>http://www.webkitchen.be/2009/01/05/11-of-all-twitters-are-sent-using-an-adobe-air-application/comment-page-1/#comment-1881</link>
		<dc:creator>Buzz Meter: DestroyTwitter &#187; The Buzz Bin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Jan 2009 14:00:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.webkitchen.be/?p=680#comment-1881</guid>
		<description>[...] a &#8220;robust but compact Twitter application built on the Adobe AIR platform&#8221; (a reported 11% of all Tweets sent are using an Adobe AIR application). DT consists of a series of canvases that constantly update and keep tweets [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] a &#8220;robust but compact Twitter application built on the Adobe AIR platform&#8221; (a reported 11% of all Tweets sent are using an Adobe AIR application). DT consists of a series of canvases that constantly update and keep tweets [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Daryl James</title>
		<link>http://www.webkitchen.be/2009/01/05/11-of-all-twitters-are-sent-using-an-adobe-air-application/comment-page-1/#comment-1841</link>
		<dc:creator>Daryl James</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 10 Jan 2009 18:39:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.webkitchen.be/?p=680#comment-1841</guid>
		<description>I wasn&#039;t aware of TweetDeck.  It seems like it&#039;s going to be the perfect fit for my Twittering from my Mac.  I was using a combination of on-site and email, but this seems simpler.  To be honest, I&#039;ve been wanting to try one of the new AIR apps.  Besides TweetDeck, can anyone recommend any additional &quot;best-of&quot; AIR apps?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I wasn&#8217;t aware of TweetDeck.  It seems like it&#8217;s going to be the perfect fit for my Twittering from my Mac.  I was using a combination of on-site and email, but this seems simpler.  To be honest, I&#8217;ve been wanting to try one of the new AIR apps.  Besides TweetDeck, can anyone recommend any additional &#8220;best-of&#8221; AIR apps?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

