That’s fantastic news actually, but what i’m asking myself: they say they can spider all the text in the swf. But when you load the text from, let’s say an XML file, they see that link to the xml file as a seperate link and index the xml as a seperate “site”. What about the text in the dynamic textfields, filled in by the text from the xml?
do they only index static textfields or also dynamic textfields?

At FiveHT we’ve been dealing with this issue for years it was always the one missing piece and since we only build using full flash interfaces this had to be solved; so this year we built a new web platform: it drives data, php apps and more, through our flash interface. Its cool; massively scalable, rich media ready and best of all its completely search engine friendly. This occurs not via the disappointing Google plugging that adobe promised would solve the problem, to solve this riddle we had to go back to basics. The system provides search engines exactly what they need to efficiently read all content, links and Meta information a simple easy to read html output. This opens up the door for complete creative freedom while maintaining global web accessibility. To make this magic happen more easily the full function cms platform; not only cuts our website deployment time by more than fifty percent, but it allows our customers complete text, image, rich media and SEO management all in html. Clients can even modify individual page Meta tags and descriptions while the system automatically generates and synchronizes Google XML Sitemaps and HTML Data feeds to ensure reliable and consistent search engine spidering. The result are happy clients who get the best of both worlds exceptional rich media designs, riding entirely on a completely search engine readable base. Problem Solved.. Finally!?