<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: 3000+ reasons why Flash isn&#8217;t going anywhere soon</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.webkitchen.be/2010/03/03/3000-reasons-why-flash-isnt-going-anywhere-soon/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.webkitchen.be/2010/03/03/3000-reasons-why-flash-isnt-going-anywhere-soon/</link>
	<description>Life as an Adobe platform evangelist</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 Feb 2012 14:36:52 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: idroot</title>
		<link>http://www.webkitchen.be/2010/03/03/3000-reasons-why-flash-isnt-going-anywhere-soon/comment-page-1/#comment-14212</link>
		<dc:creator>idroot</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Aug 2010 01:00:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.webkitchen.be/?p=2203#comment-14212</guid>
		<description>One major thing many people seem to forget is that HTML 5 in and of itself is merely a specification. No more, no less. What can make it a &#039;standard&#039; boils down to uniform implementation on behalf of the browsers. Now looking back at history we can see that relying on all the different browsers to achieve standards is like waiting for a glass of water to freeze in hell. That said, it is my opinion that you shouldn&#039;t hold your breath for HTML 5 to live up to its many promises. It sounds good on paper, but what it will boil down to is more headaches for web developers. Mark my words. 

Like it or not, Flash is the closest thing to a standard the web has ever experienced.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>One major thing many people seem to forget is that HTML 5 in and of itself is merely a specification. No more, no less. What can make it a &#8216;standard&#8217; boils down to uniform implementation on behalf of the browsers. Now looking back at history we can see that relying on all the different browsers to achieve standards is like waiting for a glass of water to freeze in hell. That said, it is my opinion that you shouldn&#8217;t hold your breath for HTML 5 to live up to its many promises. It sounds good on paper, but what it will boil down to is more headaches for web developers. Mark my words. </p>
<p>Like it or not, Flash is the closest thing to a standard the web has ever experienced.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: webdesign</title>
		<link>http://www.webkitchen.be/2010/03/03/3000-reasons-why-flash-isnt-going-anywhere-soon/comment-page-1/#comment-13851</link>
		<dc:creator>webdesign</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Jul 2010 10:20:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.webkitchen.be/?p=2203#comment-13851</guid>
		<description>I Think All HTML Based Sites Should Be Built in Flash . Why to stick to html if we can do almost everything in flash. Its about choice.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I Think All HTML Based Sites Should Be Built in Flash . Why to stick to html if we can do almost everything in flash. Its about choice.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: NicolásRubiopinto</title>
		<link>http://www.webkitchen.be/2010/03/03/3000-reasons-why-flash-isnt-going-anywhere-soon/comment-page-1/#comment-9996</link>
		<dc:creator>NicolásRubiopinto</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 04 Apr 2010 01:59:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.webkitchen.be/?p=2203#comment-9996</guid>
		<description>&lt;span class=&quot;topsy_trackback_comment&quot;&gt;&lt;span class=&quot;topsy_twitter_username&quot;&gt;&lt;span class=&quot;topsy_trackback_content&quot;&gt;RT @fwa: 3000+ reasons why Flash isn&#039;t going anywhere http://bit.ly/9YXbFw&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><span class="topsy_trackback_comment"><span class="topsy_twitter_username"><span class="topsy_trackback_content">RT @fwa: 3000+ reasons why Flash isn&#39;t going anywhere <a href="http://bit.ly/9YXbFw" >http://bit.ly/9YXbFw</a></span></span></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dave</title>
		<link>http://www.webkitchen.be/2010/03/03/3000-reasons-why-flash-isnt-going-anywhere-soon/comment-page-1/#comment-8795</link>
		<dc:creator>Dave</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Mar 2010 16:45:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.webkitchen.be/?p=2203#comment-8795</guid>
		<description>Flash is great for Promotional, Game or Entertainment sites. They serve a purpose and look dope.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Flash is great for Promotional, Game or Entertainment sites. They serve a purpose and look dope.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: FlashMoto</title>
		<link>http://www.webkitchen.be/2010/03/03/3000-reasons-why-flash-isnt-going-anywhere-soon/comment-page-1/#comment-7923</link>
		<dc:creator>FlashMoto</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Mar 2010 09:18:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.webkitchen.be/?p=2203#comment-7923</guid>
		<description>HTML 5 is in its early days, a few years needed to make it competitive to Flash - a whole lifetime for the Internet</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>HTML 5 is in its early days, a few years needed to make it competitive to Flash &#8211; a whole lifetime for the Internet</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

