Archive | Rants RSS feed for this section

Travel nightmare: About the Eurostar, travel and winter weather

If you are following me on Twitter, you probably read that I was affected by the Eurostar travel nightmare this weekend. I wanted to write this post to document the event for future reference.

First of all, I wasn’t stuck in the tunnel and I am really glad I wasn’t. The stories from the people who were stuck in the tunnel are absolutely horrific. Even more so now that we are hearing that celebs like Claudia Schiffer seem to have gotten special treatment and were rescued hours before everyone else. It is painfully clear that Eurostar was not prepared for emergency situations like this one. Not for emergency situations in the tunnel and not for emergencies at its terminals. While most press only focuses on the thousands of people stuck in the tunnel, they seem to be forgetting the thousands of people stuck in the terminals. Now don’t get me wrong! I certainly don’t want to minimize the ordeal that people stuck in the tunnel had to go through! I’m just saying that there were/are thousands more affected by this event. More than 55000 according to this article.

I was one of the thousands of people stuck in one of the Eurostar terminals with no or conflicting information. I just wanted to get home but Eurostar staff was not helpful at all. Some even walked away when people wanted to ask questions.

I read about the incident in the tunnel online when I got back to my hotel after a dinner party on Friday night. It was already clear to me that this was going to change my plans on getting home on Saturday morning. So the first thing I did when I woke up was check the Eurostar site and call the Eurostar customer service. The Eurostar site said that all trains were canceled until 12pm. My train was at 1pm but just to make sure I called the UK customer service line to confirm. It was 8:30 am… They were not open yet.

#1 Why was the customer service desk in the UK not opened earlier?

I then called the Belgian customer service desk. I asked them if they knew anything about cancelations or delays. They didn’t! They told me to go to the St. Pancras Eurostar terminal and get information there.

#2 Why did they not have the latest information?
#3 Why did they send everyone to the Eurostar terminal?

I arrived at St. Pancras at around 10:30pm. The terminal was in complete chaos and packed with people who wanted to find out more. Just about every Eurostar staffer gave out conflicting information. They clearly had no clue. One guy was answer questions through a megaphone but those answers were not very helpful. We could get refunds or get rebooked on a later train. Eurostar was not going to pay for hotels or flights or anything. He also said that there would be no trains leaving that day. He also said that there would be a limited service on Sunday and that we could use our tickets on Sunday. But it would be on a first come first served basis.

#4 I’ve been stuck in airports before and was always offered accommodation and food/drinks. Why does Eurostar not have a plan like that? Airlines have to offer this because of European regulations. Why is there no such ruling for trains?
#5 Why did they announce that they would have a limited service on Sunday when they really didn’t know?
#6 First come first served? Seriously? Wouldn’t it make more sense to try and get those who got stuck home as soon as possible?

I parked myself in the St. Pancras Starbucks to check if I could find any alternative way home. I first called Brussels Airlines. There were no flights available. I asked about Sunday morning and got told it was very likely that Brussels Airport would be closed on Sunday morning because they expected heavy snow in Belgium. Great… I then checked ferries but also read about problems there. I eventually decided to stay an extra night and to wait for the Eurostar announcement. They were going to announce the limited schedule at 4pm. I called the hotel that Adobe uses regularly to check if they had any rooms available and they did. This hotel is not that far from St. Pancras so I was sure to be early on Sunday morning.

Because I was absolutely freezing (Great design those open doors at St. Pancras!) I immediately went to the hotel to wait for the Eurostar announcement and to warm up.

The 4pm Eurostar announcement confirmed that there would a limited service on Sunday and that they would reimburse reasonable out-of-pocket expenses. The limited schedule was going to be announcement later that day. And so I kept refreshing the Eurostar website every 15 minutes or so until I read the update at 9pm. “No trains on Sunday”. They also changed the statement and it did not mention anything about reimbursing expenses anymore. (Note to self: Next time you’re in this situation, take screenshots of everything). With the extra hotel night and the flight I was about to book, I am now looking at an extra €450.

#7 Why was the statement changed? Did Eurostar realize how much this was going to cost? Surely they have insurance that would cover this, no?

So I decided to book a flight home… I figured the biggest problems would be in the mornings and so I booked a flight that would arrive at 1pm.

When I woke up on Sunday morning, I immediately checked the Heathrow and Brussels Airport websites and read “Due to severe weather conditions across the UK and Europe, delays and cancellations are possible today”. When I arrived in Heathrow, I got a text message from back home saying that Brussels Airport was now closed. The airport staff hadn’t heard anything yet so the flight was still departing on the scheduled time. They even called us to the gate at the scheduled time but then they told us that Brussels Airport was closed. They were going to board us anyway so they could leave immediately if Brussels Airport opened. They told us we could be looking at up to 3 hours on the plane. We had 10 minutes to decide if we would get on the plane or not. If we didn’t we would be rebooked on a later flight. After a few minutes, we were told a different story. We were not going to board as the flight now had a departure time of 12:50. “But please keep an eye on the monitors because we may get an earlier slot”.

#8 Why don’t airports have some sort of intranet where you can see the same information as you get on the monitors?
#9 Why don’t airports have a system that can text/tweet/email you any updates? (Heathrow actually has a system like that but my flight was not on it because the system thought the flight had already left)

At around the 12:30, the monitors said “Delayed to 12:50. Gate opens at 12:45″. It was very obvious that we were not going to leave at 12:50. Even more so because the Brussels Airport site had us arriving at 5pm.

Depending on who you asked, we were now going to leave at either 3pm or 5pm. At 2pm they called us back to the gate for boarding… And this time it was for real. I finally got home at 6pm.

I realize that the “extreme” weather is what both Eurostar and Brussels Airport are using as an excuse but I wonder if it really is that extreme. Eurostar claims they haven’t seen this weather over the last 8 years but Eurostar is already 15 years old!?

#10 How can this only be happening now? Isn’t it time for new machinery?

Brussels Airport only has one snowblower for the entire airport. They are clearly not equipped to handle this type of weather.

The biggest problem I had during this nightmare is the lack of and consistent communication. Surely in this digital day and age they could have done a much better job. When you book a flight or Eurostar train, you have to enter both your email address and cell phone number. Why aren’t they using that to communicate delays and cancelations? And what about Twitter? Or even their own websites?

I really hope Eurostar has learned a lesson… And I really hope Brussels Airport invests in being better prepared for situations like these.

I’m flying to the US next Sunday… I really hope things are back to normal by then but I’m not holding my breath.

Read full storyComments { 2 }

Geo restrictions on media are so 2001!

I know I ranted about this topic before… But this just keeps bugging me. Here’s a question for you: When a large percentage of web users know how to circumvent geo restrictions on media files, what’s the point of even having geo restrictions?

geo.jpgI understand that copyrights need to be negotiated in every single country and that is just where this problem starts. Record companies, Hollywood studios, publishers and broadcasters are still thinking in old media and it’s about time that they wake up and join the rest of us here in 2009.

When a new TV show is launched in the US, it can take up to a few years before I can see it anywhere on local TV. So, if I choose to watch this before it is available in my country, why can’t I? Why do I have to wait fo my local broadcaster to pick this up and watch it when they feels like airing it? And what if they decide to cancel the show?

How about an example? I really like Burn Notice for instance. This show is currently in its second season in the US. None of the local commercial broadcasters has picked this up yet. Now imagine they pick it up next year or so. They may air season one and then decide to cancel it. Where do I go as a fan with geo restrictions in place? I know this show is available on Hulu but officially I’m not allowed to watch it.

Same goes for the music industry. What if I like artist X but the local office for record company Y decides not to release it in my country? What do I do? I download it. What if artist Z releases his album in my country months after he released it in the US? What do I do? I download it. Would I buy it if it was available (on CD or as legal download)? Absolutely.

There’s actually a very good example on YouTube right now: Esmee Denters. This girl from Holland used to just record herself singing and then upload it to YouTube. She rapidly became one of YouTube’s most watched stars and got offered a record deal by Justin Timberlake. While her videos were watched all over the planet, you can no longer watch her new videos because of that very record deal she got because people watched her videos…

And what about the movie industry? With some exceptions, movies tend to be released about 6 months to up to a year later in Europe. Most movies are already available in the US iTunes store before they hit the theaters in Europe. So what do people do…? I think you get the idea. Would I buy or rent that new release if it was available in the local iTunes store or equivalent? I sure would and I’m actually also doing that now. Again, it’s very easy to circumvent geo restrictions even in the iTunes store. Do I stop going to the movie theaters? No… I still go and see the occasional movie in the theater.

Also, when I travel to the US, I can walk in to any Best Buy, Virgin Megastore or the likes and pick up any CD. There are no geo restrictions on that CD but if I want to pick up a DVD or Blu-ray, I can’t play that when I get back home. So what do people do? Get a multi-region player.

So let me ask this again: When a large percentage of users know how to circumvent geo restrictions on media files, CDs, DVDs and Blu-ray DVDs, what’s the point of even having geo restrictions?

Read full storyComments { 6 }

OT Rant: SMS games: How can this be legal…?

<RANT>When I tuned in to watch the news just now, I happened to catch a commercial for yet another SMS game. “Win a free Nintendo Wii!”, the commercial screamed.

Let’s see how free “free” actually is…
First of all, most of these games are subscription based (even though they only print that in unreadable text) and so is this one. €6 per week. In almost transparent tiny letters, the commercial says that this game ends on December 31st (their website does not mention the end date). So if I enter the game today, that still leaves me about 25 weeks. The subscription alone will cost you €150.

But that’s not all! You also have to answer a bunch of questions to actually get a chance at winning the console. Each question costs you an additional €1,5 (on top of the actual cost of the SMS)! The commercial doesn’t say anything about how many questions you get. Out of curiosity, I visited the advertised (although also in tiny almost unreadable letters) website and found that there are 15 questions per week! That’s an additional €22,5 per week adding up to a grand total of €712,5. And that only gives you a chance to win the console! You can almost buy 3 Wii consoles for that price…

This is just one example. There are dozens if not hundreds of other examples like this one. Is it just me or is this a very obvious rip off? Some of you will probably think that no one falls for an obvious scam like this. However, if you switch on any music television station, you see commercials like this every 10 minutes or so. Since these commercials also cost money, it’s obvious that people DO fall for this… So… Let me ask this… How can this be legal?</RANT>

Read full storyComments { 3 }

No Twitter support outside US?

failwhaleI know this is a bit off topic but it’s something that’s been bugging me. As many of you know, I am working on a Flash Lite based Twitter application (mTwit) that will run across all devices that have Flash Lite on board. Even though my account and my server have been whitelisted on the Twitter service, this is now the second day that my Twitter account gets suspended “due to strange activity“. I’m not sure what else I can do to make sure that a) Twitter doesn’t suspend me while developing the app and b) my server back end gets accepted as a Twitter proxy. I’m pretty sure I did all I was supposed to and did all I can.

In dealing with the Twitter support people, I noticed that it seems that there isn’t a single support representative outside the US. That means that getting support outside the US business hours seems to be a big no-no. I wonder how many people outside the US use Twitter. I bet it’s a massive number.

This is rapidly becoming one of my pet peeves… Companies/startups should start thinking outside their borders! Especially when they are active on the Internet. The Internet doesn’t stop at the border!

So… Because of no support outside US business hours I won’t be on Twitter (and won’t be working on my app) until they reinstate my account.

Read full storyComments { 1 }

“Flash apps are bloated, HTML/JavaScript apps are not”

This seems to be one of the most common concerns/comments people have against Flash applications. So I did a quick little test to see exactly how big or bloated some popular sites/RIAs actually are… The test shows that HTML/JavaScript apps can be equally as “bloated” as Flash based apps. Sure… You can build apps that are as small as a couple of kilobytes with HTML/JavaScript but you can do the same with Flash based apps. 

HTML/JAVASCRIPT BASED APPS
Google Mail: 2.433MB
gmailtransfer.jpg

Mobile Me: 2.546MB
mobileme_transfer.jpg

Facebook: 2.62MB
facebook_transfer.jpg

FLASH BASED APPS
SumoPaint: 1.105MB
sumopaint_transfer.jpg

Hobnox AudioTool: 2.358MB (but you did load more than a halve music studio)
hobnox_transfer.jpg

VW Used Car Locater: 1.578MB
vw_transfer.jpg

Read full storyComments { 15 }

Rant alert: The world is bigger than the US alone

copyrights.jpgI was just reading the live blogs coming from the Amazon press conference and felt kind of disappointed… again… I was hoping that Amazon would announce the European launch of the Kindle. But sadly… no.

I’m pretty sure it is yet another copyright issue that is preventing Amazon from launching Kindle worldwide. And that is exactly something that needs to change. With the Internet being this widespread and content accessible worldwide, old school copyrights and release tactics just don’t work any more. And in my opinion, they also make no sense at all.

Sadly… It’s not just Amazon. Apple’s iTunes is another good example. iTunes TV shows and movies are still only available in 1 or 2 countries in Europe. Or what about other online video providers like Netflix and Hulu? Even though it is perfectly possible to access these sites outside the US, copyright laws prevent you from using their service. Why is that?

Wouldn’t it make more sense to release books, movies, music, games, … on the same day worldwide? Combine available marketing power into one global campaign? Could that also have a positive effect on piracy? If I can go and see/buy a movie on the same day as someone across the ocean can, surely there is no need to download it? I would have no problem paying to see a movie or a new episode of a TV show.

Sadly, this is not even just restricted to copyright laws. Remember the launch of the iPhone? It was available only in the US for months. What did people outside the US do? They bought one in the US and hacked it. There are plenty of other examples like this one out there…

I know this blog post is not going to change anything but at least I got it out of my system ;-) Would love to hear your thoughts though!

UPDATE: As Mike Chambers pointed out, in some cases this is a knife that cuts both ways. People in the US also can’t watch content from Europe.

- End of rant -

Read full storyComments { 7 }

Why does it still take multiple days to transfer money from one bank to another?

<RANT>
I’ve been wondering about this for a while and I post this here hoping that someone in the financial world can explain this to me. In this modern day and age, why does it still take multiple days (up to 7 working days) to transfer money from one bank to another? I mean… I always use net banking (I never go in to the bank with the exception of getting a new card every x years) so from the moment I click the send button on my payment, the money should be in the other bank account, right? There is no physical action needed. Everything is done electronically. Just like sending an email, right?

You would think that it would only take seconds but instead it takes up to 7 working days to get money from one bank to the other. Is someone physically taking this money from one bank to the other and is that the reason for this delay? Probably not… “It’s because you pay interests during these days and that’s how banks make money”, someone replied on Twitter this morning. Wait… What? Interests? For what? To do a transfer? A transfer that I entered in to the system using net banking? A transfer that is done electronically? I get that I would have to pay something if someone at the bank has to actually do something. But when I do all the work, why should I still pay for this? I am already paying €30 a year for the “privilege” of using a bank account. That’s €30 to do all the work yourself… And banks still managed to get in trouble?

So… Is this the biggest scam in the world? Or is there really a perfectly valid reason why this takes so long? And how come PayPal is able to do it like this? You enter the recipient, enter the amount, click send, and *boom* the recipient has money. Sigh… Sorry for the rant, but this has been bugging me for years and I really hope someone in banking can explain this… but I’m not holding my breath.
</RANT>

Read full storyComments { 12 }

Is imitation really the sincerest form of flattery?

That’s what they say, right? But I’m wondering… Is it still flattery of you brag about it and say that it is a world first?

Here’s the story. This week, Belgian band Clouseau released a new track and the accompanying video clip. They also launched an online version of the video clip which is supposed to be an absolute first… I’m not so sure.

clouseau1.jpg

This is the first screen. Already loo familiar? So you have 6 different rooms and when you click on them, you zoom in to the room.

clouseau2.jpg

While it is still pretty cool, it’s far from an absolute first. Big Spaceship already did this for the HBO Voyeur project.

hbo1.jpg
hbo2.jpg

So… Is imitation the sincerest form of flattery? I have my doubts…

You can compare it yourself:
Clouseau (I have no idea why registration is required)
HBO Voyeur

UPDATE: I knew other politicians were going to copy some of Obama’s web tactics but I never would have guessed it was going to be this extreme. Check this out!

Read full storyComments { 2 }

Why I think the Open Screen project matters…

It’s all about user experience. I could just end this post right here because that’s what I think is the main reason the Open Screen project matters. The Flash platform has really revolutionized the user experience on the web and we have all gotten used to having this rich experience. With more and more devices being connected to the web, people expect these devices to have the same experience they are used to. Just the other day, I was witnessing a new high-end-phone user surfing the web. She could not understand why some parts of the sites she was browsing to, worked fine on a PC but not on that new, shiny and expensive high-end-phone. Things like little widgets on a page or even full sites would only show a little “missing plugin” icon. “That’s because this phone doesn’t have Flash”, I remember saying which she just couldn’t grasp.

We’ve all become accustomed to things just working without having to think about it and also to having rich interfaces on the web. We are used to seeing animated menus on DVD’s and are rapidly getting used to seeing interactive menus on Bluray discs. We’re used to animated rich menus on game consoles and its games. So why can’t we have this experience everywhere?

If I switch on my digital TV set-top box at home, it’s far from a rich ‘engaging’ user experience. The interface is dull and dead slow with no connectivity to online information and communities. I always think about what I could do with Flash to have a richer experience Flash only were available on this STB. The same thing goes for the menus in TV’s. How much more could you do if you could ask a Flash designer/developer to make the menu instead of having to write it in some obscure language that offers no richness whatsoever. How much more exciting would it be to control your TV/STB/PVR with a rich connected user interface that immediately gets online reviews, ratings and comments about the TV-shows you are programming?

This is why I think the Open Screen project matters. It’s not just about bringing Flash/AIR to mobile devices, I think it’s about bringing that rich experience that people are used to, everywhere.

Read full storyComments { 10 }

When does copyrighting go too far?

Update: The Atomium owners have come to their senses. They now issued a statement that says that “they won’t ask for license fees on amateur photographs during this anniversary year”. That means the exhibitors are in the clear and won’t have to remove the Atomium from the photographs they’re exhibiting. The exhibitors would like to thank everyone who responded and blogged about it.

My home town Mechelen (Belgium) is having an exhibition about the world expo in Belgium in 1958. One of the only remaining buildings from that year’s world expo is the Atomium, one of the most recognized buildings in Belgium. When tourists visit Belgium, this is on their agenda. Obviously, a lot of pictures are taken in front of the Atomium.

The exhibition in Mechelen was supposed to show these types of photos. Photos of people who had visited Belgium during the world expo. Sounds very innocent, right? Well… Since the Atomium was/is such a prominent building on the world expo site, it’s obvious that this appears in a lot of photos. According to copyright laws, they can’t show the pictures. Well… They can show the pictures but it can’t have the Atomium in it. Every time the image of the Atomium is shown, they (and actually, you too) have to pay a copyright fee, get written approval from the company that manages the building and to top it off, every photo must have the “(c) vzw Atomium” copyright line.

The exhibitor has found a creative way to get around that and is now looking for 100 Photoshoppers to cut out the Atomium from all of the exhibited photos. That just seems wrong to me. I mean, it’s totally cool that they are specifically asking for Photoshoppers (Photoshop being an Adobe product :D) but the reason why seems wrong to me. The Atomium is a public building and a landmark that was (probably) paid for with tax payer’s money but you can’t show pictures from it without paying copyrights to the building owner. So that got me wondering where this copyright-fee goes to? Does it go back to the owners of the building, in this case the tax payers? I think not…

So when does copyrighting go too far? I think this would be an excellent example.

Read full storyComments { 12 }
Page 1 of 212